I am winding up (down?) my presentation and defense of the truth of Christ's pre-Bethlehem glory with three big points, the first of which is highlighted today. These points include:

1) Two instances of unintentional ignorance by the Tories   
       a) Unawareness of the logical fallacy of False Equivalence
       b) Unawareness of the law of the metaphor/analogy

2) One instance (by two Tories) of admitted ignorance 
       a) Richard Golko can't wrap his head around the humility required for Christ to go from the form of God to the form of a slave
      b) Liam McCallisterr, in his mind, says the Word becoming flesh is too fantastic for his mind to comprehend; it's "Disney-like" to him; it's too fantastic; it's "not even real."

At first I thought the Tories were just against Christ's pre-Bethlehem glories. Now I discover that they don't even understand them---AND (this is the shock) THEY ADMIT IT ON CAMERA!

How can you refute something you can't even intellectually grasp? I have no idea---but they do it anyway. (It's not a good look.)

As for today, we see from one of the Tory Chiefs a complete lack of understanding of one of the most basic of all logical fallacies: False Equivalence. False Equivalence assumes that because two things or peoples have one thing in common, that therefore they have everything in common.

I expose this gross error rather forcefully and convincingly so, if you're the least bit squeamish about coarse language and ridicule, please don't watch this video. Go catch something from Disney.